Early Saturday morning, the world changed again as the United States and Israel launched coordinated US strikes on Iran, marking the most significant direct military action against the Iranian regime in years, and possibly decades, with President Donald Trump confirming that “major combat operations” are underway in what the Pentagon has named Operation Epic Fury, while Israel calls its campaign Operation Roaring Lion.
What Triggered the US Strikes on Iran
President Trump announced that the US strikes on Iran are designed to eliminate “imminent threats” posed by the regime, citing decades of Iranian-backed terrorism including the 1979 hostage crisis, the 1983 Beirut Marine barracks bombing that killed 241 American service members, proxy attacks in Iraq that maimed and killed US troops, and Tehran’s financial and military support for Hamas, which carried out the October 7 massacre in Israel that left more than 1,000 dead, including dozens of Americans.
Joint Planning Between Washington and Jerusalem
According to both US and Israeli officials speaking to Fox News and CNN, the US strikes on Iran were not improvised but the result of months of joint planning, with Israel reportedly targeting senior Iranian leadership figures including Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, President Masoud Pezeshkian, and senior military officials, while US forces are focusing primarily on missile infrastructure, military facilities, and targets believed to pose immediate threats to American troops and regional allies.
Trump’s Message: No Nuclear Iran, No More Warnings
In an eight-minute video address posted to Truth Social, Trump made clear that the US strikes on Iran are about one central objective: preventing the regime from obtaining a nuclear weapon, repeating emphatically that “they will never have a nuclear weapon,” and accusing Tehran of attempting to rebuild its nuclear infrastructure at Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan after previous US strikes last year that he claimed had severely degraded the program.
Regime Change: Stated Goal or Strategic Pressure?
While Israeli officials publicly emphasized that their focus is military objectives rather than formal regime change, Trump directly addressed the Iranian people, urging them to “take over your government” once operations conclude and offering members of the Revolutionary Guard and security forces “complete immunity” if they lay down their arms, language that strongly signals that the US strikes on Iran are not merely punitive but potentially transformative in scope.
Iran Responds With Regional Missile Barrage
Iran wasted no time retaliating, launching what CNN described as an unprecedented wave of ballistic missile attacks toward Israel and US-linked targets across the Gulf, with explosions reported in Tel Aviv, Doha, Dubai, Bahrain, and parts of the UAE, and Iranian state-affiliated outlets claiming strikes against Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, Al Salem in Kuwait, Al Dhafra in the UAE, and the US Fifth Fleet base in Bahrain.
Gulf Bases and Civilian Impact
Air defense systems in Qatar, Jordan, Kuwait, and the UAE reportedly intercepted multiple missiles, though one civilian in Abu Dhabi was killed by falling debris, and video verified by CNN showed a missile striking a US Navy facility in Bahrain, underscoring that the US strikes on Iran have now triggered a regional confrontation stretching well beyond Iran’s borders.
Media Framing: Escalation or Long-Overdue Action?
As the US strikes on Iran unfold, international leaders have urged restraint, with the European Union calling the situation “perilous” and others warning of regional catastrophe, while CNN analysts described the operation as a “very big gamble,” questioning whether regime change can realistically follow, yet critics of that framing argue that for 47 years the regime has exported violence with limited consequences and that escalation did not begin this week.
A Calculated Risk, Not a Blank Check
Even Trump acknowledged in his address that American lives could be lost and that war carries costs, but he framed the US strikes on Iran as necessary to prevent a nuclear-armed theocracy from threatening US troops, European allies, and potentially the American homeland itself, making clear that this is not presented as a short symbolic strike but as a sustained campaign that could last days and possibly longer.
The Strategic Clock Is Now Ticking
Military analysts note that dismantling missile infrastructure and permanently crippling nuclear ambitions is far more complex than delivering an initial wave of strikes, and Iran’s strategy appears to be to regionalize the conflict quickly by targeting US bases across multiple countries, attempting to raise the cost of continued US strikes on Iran and force diplomatic pressure for a ceasefire.
What Happens Next
At this moment, neither Washington nor Tehran appears to have publicly embraced a diplomatic off-ramp, though history suggests that even intense conflicts often circle back to negotiations once battlefield realities set in, and the key question now is whether the US strikes on Iran will degrade the regime’s capabilities enough to shift internal dynamics or whether they will harden resistance and deepen regional instability.
The Stakes for America and the Middle East
This is not a limited skirmish but a defining moment that could reshape the Middle East balance of power, testing whether “peace through strength” can prevent a nuclear breakout while avoiding an open-ended war, and as missiles fly and air defenses light up Gulf skies, one thing is certain: the US strikes on Iran have moved this confrontation from shadow warfare to open conflict.
WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.
JIMMY
Find more articles like this at steadfastandloyal.com.
h/t: Steadfast and Loyal
