The Irony Is Almost Too Perfect
For years, New York Attorney General Letitia James strutted around promising to “get Trump” like it was her personal mission from God. She ran for office on that platform. She beamed about it in interviews. And she delivered — sort of — with that 2023 civil fraud case that slapped Trump with a $350 million judgment. But now? The same Justice Department she accused of being “politicized” when it dared to investigate Democrats is dropping subpoenas on her desk like overdue bills.
When Weaponization Boomerangs
Jim Trusty — a former Trump attorney and DOJ prosecutor — summed it up best: “You reap what you sow.” James’ gleeful “find the man, then find the crime” strategy may have played well to Manhattan cocktail parties, but it’s a legal landmine when you’re the one holding the shovel. Now federal prosecutors want to know if she deprived Trump — and by extension, his voters — of their civil rights by targeting him for political reasons. You know, the exact accusation Democrats love to hurl at Republicans.
Internal Emails Could Be Her Kryptonite
Trusty floated the juiciest possibility — that subpoenas could pry open James’ internal communications, exposing exactly what she and her staff said behind closed doors. If she buried exculpatory evidence during the civil trial or flat-out admitted this was about keeping Trump out of office, it won’t just look bad — it could meet the legal threshold for “deprivation of rights under color of law.” Translation: the political hitwoman might need a defense lawyer.
Civil Rights for Me, Not for Thee
The Left has been singing the “protect democracy” chorus so loudly, you’d think they were auditioning for Broadway. Yet here we are — investigating whether a top Democrat prosecutor trampled on the constitutional rights of the leading Republican candidate. If the DOJ proves she targeted Trump with the intent to sideline him politically, this isn’t just about Trump. It’s about millions of Americans whose votes she allegedly tried to nullify.
From Queen of Lawfare to Defendant-in-Waiting?
Letitia James became the poster child for lawfare — using the courts as a political bludgeon against her enemies. But this investigation could slam the brakes on that trend. Imagine a world where prosecutors think twice before using their office like an opposition research arm. Crazy, right? But if this probe sticks, it might just happen. And that’s why Democrats are panicking — because the same playbook they used on Trump might now be coming for them.
The DOJ’s New Target List Is Getting Long
James isn’t alone on the subpoena dance card. Special Counsel Jack Smith — another Trump antagonist — is also under federal investigation. It’s almost like Trump’s campaign promise to hold his political enemies accountable wasn’t just talk. For once, “turnabout is fair play” is actually being enforced in Washington.
Will the Bar Do Anything? Don’t Hold Your Breath
Trusty joked that waiting for the New York Bar to care about prosecutorial misconduct is like waiting for him to play in the WNBA. Translation: It’s not happening. So if James gets held accountable, it’ll be because the feds did it — not because the legal establishment suddenly grew a conscience.
Bottom Line: The Game Has Changed
This isn’t just another political spat. It’s a shot across the bow for every prosecutor who thinks they can run on “getting” a political opponent and face zero consequences. Whether James ends up in court or just with a bruised ego, the message is clear — the hunter can become the hunted. And right now, Letitia James is squarely in the crosshairs.
WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.
JIMMY
Find more articles like this at steadfastandloyal.com.
h/t: Steadfast and Loyal
