When Glamour UK unveiled its 2025 “Women of the Year” cover featuring nine transgender women, even long-time observers of media activism were caught off guard. It wasn’t just another glossy photoshoot; it was a declaration — one that seemed to suggest that womanhood is now an open membership, unbound by biology or reality. J.K. Rowling, never one to shrink from cultural controversy, called it what many women quietly believe but fear to say aloud: that this rebranding of womanhood tells girls that “men are better women than they are.” It’s a message both regressive and profoundly insulting to the women who fought for the recognition, rights, and representation that magazines like Glamour once championed.
When ‘Women of the Year’ No Longer Means Women
The irony is sharp enough to cut glass. A publication that once celebrated women’s empowerment now showcases biological men as the pinnacle of modern femininity. The result isn’t progress — it’s confusion. Young women are watching a society that once told them they could “be anything” now tell them that their womanhood itself can be borrowed, performed, or redefined by anyone who feels like it. Critics argue this shift has more to do with ideological conformity than inclusivity. By trying to be “modern,” the media elite have managed to erase the very thing they claim to uplift — real women with real experiences rooted in biological reality.
Courage in the Cancel Era — Rowling Refuses to Bow
J.K. Rowling’s willingness to speak plainly on this issue has made her a rare figure in today’s celebrity culture. Despite relentless backlash and efforts to silence her, she refuses to apologize for believing that sex is real and that women deserve spaces and recognition exclusive to them. She doesn’t shout or insult; she reasons, often reminding her critics that defending women’s rights should not require a disclaimer. Her courage stands as a quiet rebuke to the many who once claimed to champion women’s equality but now stay silent out of fear of losing followers or film deals.
A Cultural Moment That Demands Clarity
This debate isn’t about kindness or cruelty — it’s about truth. A society that can no longer define “woman” cannot possibly defend her. When the word itself becomes subjective, laws, protections, and opportunities built around it collapse. Rowling’s critics may call her outdated, but history tends to be kind to those who hold the line when everyone else is bending with the wind. If defending womanhood is now considered controversial, perhaps the controversy says more about the culture than about her.
Standing for Common Sense
Many Americans, across political lines, are beginning to see through the smokescreen of “progressivism” that demands applause for the absurd. They recognize that acknowledging biological truth is not hate — it’s honesty. It’s the foundation upon which fairness in sports, safety in spaces, and respect for womanhood were built. J.K. Rowling has done something the rest of the entertainment world should try once in a while: told the truth.
Editor’s Note: This article reflects the opinion of the author.
WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.
JIMMY
We welcome open discussion and thoughtful opinions — even strong disagreements — but comments containing profanity, personal attacks, or hate speech will be removed. Keep it civil, keep it smart, and keep it focused on the ideas.
h/t: Steadfast and Loyal
