When “Russia, Russia, Russia” Finally Stopped Working
Former CIA Director John Brennan had what can only be described as a public meltdown this weekend when someone dared to question him about his role in one of the biggest political hoaxes of our time — the infamous letter claiming the Hunter Biden laptop had “all the hallmarks” of Russian disinformation. It happened at the Intelligence and National Security Summit at George Mason University, where Brennan, a man who once oversaw America’s most secretive operations, apparently couldn’t handle a simple question from national security consultant Thomas Speciale. Brennan’s response? Red-faced fury and finger-pointing — literally.
The Video That Says It All
Speciale, a former senior advisor to Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, calmly asked Brennan why he signed the letter now proven false. The reaction was instant and unhinged. Brennan puffed up, jabbed his finger into Speciale’s chest, and shouted, “We never said it was disinformation. We said it was Russian influence operations, which is what they do. There’s a big difference.” Apparently, that “difference” was lost on the millions of Americans misled right before the 2020 election. Brennan’s tone said it all — the old intelligence crowd still can’t admit they helped bury a legitimate story to protect a preferred candidate.
The Laptop They Tried to Erase
Back in October 2020, when the New York Post dropped its bombshell report about Hunter Biden’s laptop, the establishment went into overdrive. Within hours, social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook throttled the story, blocked links, and even suspended users for daring to share it. The justification? That letter — signed by Brennan and 50 other “former intelligence officials” — which declared the story had “all the classic earmarks of Russian disinformation.” Translation: “We don’t want this story out before Election Day.”
The Collusion They Said Didn’t Happen
The kicker? It wasn’t Moscow pulling strings — it was Washington. In sworn testimony, former acting CIA Director Mike Morrell admitted that the Biden campaign asked him to get those signatures to “help Biden” win the election. The campaign official who made the call? None other than current Secretary of State Antony Blinken, according to congressional investigators. So the same people who spent four years screaming about “foreign interference” were quietly orchestrating a domestic interference campaign of their own. Irony doesn’t get thicker than that.
Brennan’s New Definition of “Influence”
When Brennan now claims he never said it was disinformation — only that it was “Russian influence” — it’s the kind of semantic tap-dancing only a seasoned bureaucrat could love. It’s like saying, “I didn’t lie; I just didn’t tell the truth in a way you’d recognize.” The letter was written, promoted, and weaponized specifically to discredit true information that might have damaged Joe Biden politically. It wasn’t about Russia — it was about damage control.
Media Gatekeepers and the Great Election Clean-Up
Legacy media outlets jumped on the letter like it was gospel. CNN, MSNBC, The Washington Post, and others parroted the “Russian disinformation” line without a hint of skepticism. The same outlets that once prided themselves on “speaking truth to power” suddenly became the press office for the Democratic National Committee. The effect was immediate: the laptop story was buried, censored, and ridiculed as conspiracy theory. But as the years rolled on, every single piece of that story has been verified. Emails, business records, photos — all real. The “hallmarks of Russian disinformation” turned out to be the hallmarks of media manipulation.
Americans Weren’t Fooled Forever
The American people might be patient, but they’re not stupid. A TIPP Insights poll found that 79% of Americans believe truthful reporting on the Hunter Biden laptop would have changed the outcome of the 2020 election. Think about that — nearly four out of five voters believe censorship and collusion affected their vote. For a democracy, that’s not a small oversight; that’s a crisis of trust.
When Accountability Knocks, the Elites Shout “Conspiracy!”
Now that the evidence is undeniable, Brennan and company have shifted from denial to revisionism. The playbook is simple: when caught, redefine your words, question your critics, and accuse them of bad faith. Brennan’s furious exchange with Speciale wasn’t just a moment of anger — it was a window into the arrogance of the intelligence elite. They believe they can decide what’s true and what’s too “dangerous” for public consumption. Spoiler alert: that’s not how a free republic works.
The Moment the Mask Slipped
What makes Brennan’s meltdown so revealing is how quickly the calm, polished “statesman” persona gave way to the defensive bureaucrat. The man who once briefed presidents couldn’t handle being briefed by a citizen with a camera phone. It’s a symbol of what’s broken in Washington — too many people who think accountability only applies to others.
The Hunter Biden Scandal Wasn’t Just About Hunter
At its core, the laptop story was never just about one man’s bad behavior or questionable business deals. It was about influence — the kind of influence that reached from foreign boardrooms to the highest office in the land. And the decision to suppress it wasn’t just bad judgment; it was a coordinated effort that changed the course of public perception. That’s what Brennan and his fellow signatories can’t admit, because admitting it means acknowledging the damage they did to public trust in both intelligence and media institutions.
The “Russian Influence” Narrative Has Expired
After nearly a decade of blaming Russia for every domestic issue, Americans have grown immune to the word. From elections to social media memes, the “Russian influence” label became a political tool — not a security concern. Brennan’s attempt to revive that excuse in 2025 feels like a rerun of a bad show no one asked to see again. The audience has moved on, and so has the evidence.
The Price of “Protecting Democracy”
It’s worth remembering that Brennan and his colleagues justified their actions as an effort to “protect democracy.” But suppressing true information, colluding with Big Tech, and misleading the public isn’t protecting democracy — it’s undermining it. The intelligence community’s reputation took a hit, the media’s credibility cratered, and the public’s faith in fair elections still hasn’t recovered. All because a few officials decided their judgment mattered more than the truth.
Brennan’s Meltdown Wasn’t About the Question — It Was About the Truth
At the end of the day, Brennan’s outburst wasn’t just anger — it was fear. Fear of accountability, fear of exposure, and fear of losing control over a narrative that’s crumbling in real time. He wasn’t shouting at Thomas Speciale; he was shouting at the truth that finally caught up with him.
The Reckoning Still to Come
Many Americans believe the full story of the Hunter Biden laptop and the intelligence letter hasn’t been written yet. Congressional investigations are ongoing, and calls for transparency continue to grow louder. Brennan’s meltdown may just be the first crack in a wall of silence that’s starting to crumble. And when it does, maybe — just maybe — we’ll finally see the kind of accountability that’s long overdue in Washington.
Editor’s Note: This article reflects the opinion of the author.
WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.
JIMMY
We welcome open discussion and thoughtful opinions — even strong disagreements — but comments containing profanity, personal attacks, or hate speech will be removed. Keep it civil, keep it smart, and keep it focused on the ideas.
Find more articles like this at SteadfastAndLoyal.com.
h/t: Steadfast and Loyal
