When former President Donald Trump urged Senate Republicans this week to end the filibuster and push through legislation to reopen the government, the reaction in Washington was immediate and predictable. Some hailed the idea as the bold stroke of a decisive leader; others warned it would dismantle one of the last remaining guardrails of American governance. But beyond the headlines and cable-news talking points lies something more subtle—and far more consequential. The real story isn’t just whether the filibuster survives this shutdown. It’s about whether Republicans are walking into a political trap that could reshape the balance of power for decades. Because, whether anyone admits it or not, many Democrats might actually want Donald Trump to pull the trigger.
What the Filibuster Is and What It Was Never Meant to Be
The filibuster, as every civics teacher reminds us, was never part of the Constitution. The Founders didn’t design it, debate it, or even anticipate it. The word itself doesn’t appear anywhere in America’s founding documents. It emerged by accident in the early 1800s when the Senate—trying to streamline debate—removed a procedural rule called “the previous question” motion. Without that rule, senators discovered they could speak indefinitely, effectively blocking a vote. Over time, this became the Senate’s signature quirk: a place where a single determined member could hold the floor and delay legislation. In 1917, the Senate created the “cloture” rule, requiring a two-thirds vote to end debate. In 1975, that threshold was lowered to 60 votes—where it remains today. The filibuster wasn’t created as some noble instrument of democracy. It was an accident turned institution—an unplanned safeguard that evolved into a cornerstone of Senate tradition. Its defenders argue it protects minority voices and forces compromise. Its critics call it an outdated relic that paralyzes government.
Trump’s Case: A President’s Frustration with Paralysis
Trump’s argument for ending the filibuster is straightforward: America can’t afford endless gridlock. In his view, Democrats have mastered the art of using Senate procedure to block conservative reform, even when they’re out of power. Whether it’s border security, election integrity, or spending bills, a 60-vote threshold means a Republican majority can’t act without at least eight Democrats playing along. For Trump, that’s not just unfair—it’s dysfunctional. During this record-setting shutdown, he told Senate Republicans the only way to “get the country open” was to end the filibuster and act decisively. To his supporters, that sounded like common sense: if you win elections, you should be able to govern. But to many Senate traditionalists, it sounded like a constitutional earthquake.
Why Many Republicans Resist
Even among conservatives, there’s deep unease about abolishing the filibuster. Leaders like Senator John Thune and James Lankford warn that the rule isn’t just about obstruction—it’s about stability. The Senate, they argue, was never meant to be a smaller version of the House. It was designed to cool the passions of the moment, to force negotiation, to prevent wild swings in policy every two years. To them, ending the filibuster would turn the Senate into a partisan playground—one where each party, upon gaining power, could ram through its full wish list with zero restraint. And that, they say, is the kind of volatility that makes investors nervous, allies uncertain, and voters cynical.
The Democrats’ Secret Play: Let Trump Do the Dirty Work
Here’s where the 4D chess comes in. On the surface, Democrats act horrified at Trump’s suggestion to “nuke” the filibuster. They warn that he’s threatening the very soul of the Senate. But beneath that rhetoric lies a more cunning calculation. If Trump and Senate Republicans eliminate the filibuster now, Democrats can reap the benefits later—without taking the political heat for doing it themselves. When power eventually shifts, as it always does, they could pass sweeping legislation with a simple majority. They could grant statehood to Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico—locking in four new Democratic Senate seats. They could pack the Supreme Court, cementing a progressive judicial majority for generations. And through it all, they could claim innocence: “We didn’t break the rules—Trump did.”
The Real Question: Is This Checkmate or a Trap?
If Trump ends the filibuster, he wins a short-term victory but may hand Democrats the ultimate long-term weapon. If Republicans preserve it, they maintain a constitutional guardrail but risk alienating voters who are tired of seeing Washington spin its wheels. This is the strategic dilemma that defines the filibuster debate in 2025. It’s not just about procedure; it’s about patience, foresight, and political endurance. The question isn’t whether Trump can end the filibuster—it’s whether he should.
What Republicans Should Do
Republicans face enormous pressure to end this shutdown, but they shouldn’t mistake impatience for principle. This crisis isn’t the product of Republican governance—it’s the product of Democratic obstruction. The GOP already passed straightforward, “adult” legislation and now a clean CR to fund the government, pay workers, and keep essential services running. Democrats in the Senate blocked it, not because of what’s in the bill, but because they refuse to let the other side govern after losing an election. That’s not leadership—that’s a temper tantrum dressed up as moral outrage.
Democrats are holding the public hostage to score political points, betting that most Americans don’t understand how Senate rules work. And to be fair, many don’t. They see one party controlling both chambers and the White House and assume the shutdown must be a Republican problem. But what they don’t see is the Senate’s 60-vote filibuster threshold—the very rule Democrats are hiding behind to stop even basic funding measures from passing.
That’s why now is not the moment to end the filibuster out of frustration. Republicans can’t let short-term political pain push them into making a long-term mistake. The shutdown is difficult, but it’s also clarifying: it shows exactly how the Left wields procedural power to block progress while claiming moral virtue. If the GOP stays disciplined, they’ll emerge not just with the government reopened, but with the moral high ground intact.
And that high ground matters, because this battle isn’t just about 2025—it’s about what comes next. The minute Democrats regain power, they’ll move to nuke the filibuster themselves. They’ll justify it as “necessary reform” to make Washington work again, but what they’ll really do is reshape the country. They’ll grant statehood to D.C. and Puerto Rico, adding four permanent Democratic senators. They’ll pack the Supreme Court, they will grant illegals the right to vote guaranteeing Democratic control for a generation, and they’ll claim it’s all in the name of “democracy.”
If Republicans rush to end the filibuster now, they’ll have no defense later when the other side uses the same weapon to rewrite the system. The shutdown, painful as it is, offers a moment of clarity: sometimes the party that refuses to bend earns the credibility to lead later. This is a time to think long-term. Stay firm. Keep the high ground. The country will eventually see who stood for principle and who played politics.
Playing the Long Game
The Senate was never meant to be efficient—it was meant to be deliberate. That’s frustrating in moments of crisis, but it’s also what keeps republics from self-destructing. The Left has mastered the art of thinking ten moves ahead. The real challenge for Republicans is to match that patience and foresight. The filibuster may feel like an obstacle today, but it could be the last line of defense tomorrow. Ending it now might win a battle—but lose a generation.
WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.
JIMMY
Find more articles like this at SteadfastAndLoyal.com.
We welcome open discussion and thoughtful opinions—even strong disagreements—but comments containing profanity, personal attacks, or hate speech will be removed. Keep it civil, keep it smart, and keep it focused on the ideas.
h/t: Steadfast and Loyal
