In a world where our adversaries are playing the long game, it’s refreshing—no, vital—to see someone willing to speak plainly and act boldly. President Trump’s renewed push to “get” Greenland isn’t about land grabs or headline stunts—it’s about safeguarding American national security and taking back control of the resources we’ve foolishly ceded to China. And despite the Left’s pearl-clutching over his comments, Trump’s message is crystal clear: America can no longer afford to sit back while Beijing and Moscow tighten their grip on the Arctic.
Let’s set the record straight. Greenland isn’t just some frozen wasteland filled with puffins and polar bears. It sits atop some of the most valuable untapped resources on the planet: cobalt, nickel, uranium, iron, and rare earth elements—critical components in everything from electric vehicles and medical equipment to fighter jets and missile guidance systems. China already controls 60% of the global supply. Greenland could be the game-changer that breaks their monopoly.
Add to that its prime location—smack in the middle of the Arctic theater—and suddenly this icy island becomes the most strategic piece of real estate on the planet. During the Cold War, Greenland hosted dozens of U.S. military installations. Today? We have just one base—Pituffik Space Force Base, with a skeleton crew of about 200 personnel. Meanwhile, Russia is rebuilding Arctic ports and China is making quiet moves to insert itself into the region under the guise of “research.”
The stakes couldn’t be higher.
Arctic Chess, Not Checkers
While the Biden administration dithered and daydreamed about green energy utopias, China was busy buying up rare earth operations in Africa and forging Arctic shipping routes. Russia is flexing military muscle in the north like it’s 1983. And what are we doing? Relying on Denmark to maintain a territory they’ve underfunded, underdeveloped, and underprotected.
That’s why Vice President JD Vance, Sen. Mike Lee, Energy Secretary Chris Wright, and others made their recent trip to Greenland. The message wasn’t subtle: Denmark has failed Greenland—economically, militarily, and diplomatically. And if they won’t step up, the United States will.
Vance said it plainly: “You underinvested in the people of Greenland, and you’ve underinvested in the security architecture of this incredible landmass. That has to change.”
He’s right. The island’s economy is built on fishing and welfare. Denmark sends roughly $700 million a year—nearly half of Greenland’s budget—but that hasn’t translated into serious development. Meanwhile, the U.S. has dangled billions in investment to responsibly mine Greenland’s resources and cut dependence on China. But red tape and environmental restrictions—many imposed under pressure from EU bureaucrats and eco-warriors—continue to slow things down.
And yet the climate is changing. The ice is melting. New shipping routes are opening. And every time we delay, China and Russia inch closer to dominance.
Trump’s Tough Talk: A Negotiator’s Playbook
Now, let’s address the media freakout over Trump’s comment that “nothing is ruled out” when it comes to Greenland.
Let’s be adults. Trump isn’t talking about a military invasion. He knows full well that such a move would be indefensible both globally and domestically. But as anyone familiar with Trump’s negotiation style understands, tough talk is how he frames the stakes. He starts at the outer edge to create leverage and shift the Overton window toward action.
Remember when he said we should pull out of NATO or walk away from NAFTA? The media called it reckless. The establishment panicked. But what happened? He restructured NATO’s financial burden. He renegotiated NAFTA into the USMCA. It’s how he gets results. Yes, I know the Canada-Mexico tariff thing flies in the face of the USMCA, so let’s just see how that turns out.
By refusing to play the polite diplomatic game, Trump reminds our allies—and our enemies—that America has options. That we’re not afraid to lead. And that we’re done begging permission from the global peanut gallery while our adversaries laugh all the way to the mine.
Greenland: A Security Imperative
This is not about annexation. This is about creating a partnership—or at the very least, ensuring the U.S. has enough influence to secure the Arctic and develop resources that are critical to our future.
Our missile early warning systems could be bolstered with radar installations across Greenland’s vast stretches. Our naval presence could block hostile routes through the North Atlantic. Subsea cables vital to transatlantic communications could be defended from Russian ghost ships that have already been caught dragging anchors across them. And rare earth mining, done responsibly and ethically, could finally give us a counter to China’s dominance.
This isn’t conquest. It’s common sense.
Denmark’s Wake-Up Call
In response to Trump’s assertiveness and Vance’s visit, Denmark just announced a $2 billion investment in Arctic defense. That’s great. But let’s not kid ourselves—it’s only happening because Trump forced the issue.
Danish leaders have now admitted, in their own words, that they’ve neglected Greenland for years. Defense Minister Troels Lund Poulsen said it plainly: “We have not invested enough in the Arctic.”
So if Trump’s tough rhetoric is what it took to light a fire under Denmark and reassert U.S. priorities in the Arctic, then that’s a win. Period.
Final Thoughts
The Left can fear mognger all they want. They can laugh about “buying Greenland” and pretend this is some kind of vanity project. But deep down, they know better. Trump is once again identifying the strategic vulnerabilities that career politicians ignore until it’s too late.
The Arctic is the next frontier of global power—and we either lead, or we lose.
And let’s be clear: Greenlanders deserve better. They’ve been treated like second-class citizens by Denmark. Their land holds resources the world needs. If they choose independence or stronger ties with the United States, we should be ready—with investment, infrastructure, and partnership.
The world is shifting beneath our feet—literally. Ice is melting. Routes are opening. And whoever controls the Arctic will control the 21st century.
Trump sees that. The Left pretends it’s not happening.
You tell me who’s thinking long term.
WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.
JIMMY
Find more articles like this at steadfastandloyal.com
h/t: Steadfast and Loyal
