Zohran Mamdani, a New York State Assemblyman from Queens and the current frontrunner in New York City’s mayoral race, has made headlines by championing a sweeping plan to end enforcement of all misdemeanor offenses in the city. As a proud member of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), Mamdani has long advocated for policies that critics say would dismantle the city’s law-and-order framework and replace it with a social experiment rooted in ideology rather than public safety.
Defining Away Crime: “Violence Is an Artificial Construction”
Perhaps most striking is Mamdani’s effort to redefine the concept of violent crime itself. At a 2021 protest outside the Manhattan District Attorney’s office, he stated, “What violent crime is — is defined by the state… violence is an artificial construction.” This statement accompanied his push to shut down Rikers Island, eliminate cash bail, and decriminalize prostitution. That prostitution plank is not theoretical. Just this week, Mamdani doubled down on his longstanding push to legalize sex work, a move that has sparked outrage from residents, law enforcement advocates, and political opponents across party lines.
Meet the Press: Mamdani Responds to Trump and Defends Socialism
In an exclusive interview with Meet the Press, Mamdani addressed President Trump’s criticism — Trump called him a “communist” — and tried to clarify his worldview. “I don’t think we should have billionaires,” Mamdani said, citing Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. as inspiration for his democratic socialist beliefs. “It is so much money in a moment of such inequality… ultimately what we need more of is equality across the city, the state, and the country.” When asked about Trump’s comments, Mamdani responded: “I’ve already had to get used to the fact that the President is going to talk about how I look, how I sound, and who I am. I’m fighting for the very people that he ran a campaign to empower.” He insisted that being a democratic socialist does not mean being a communist, and claimed he wants a “fair property tax system” and a “city that is fair for all of us” — even as his policy proposals suggest a radical reimagining of public safety and wealth distribution.
The Misdemeanors at Stake: Not So Minor
The crimes Mamdani and the DSA want to erase from the city’s enforcement priorities are not harmless mistakes. In New York State, misdemeanors include petit larceny (theft under $1,000), drug possession, assault without a weapon, prostitution, and driving while intoxicated. These offenses can carry penalties of up to one year in jail. Critics argue that removing consequences for such behavior will embolden repeat offenders, overwhelm communities, and undermine public trust in the justice system. Susan Ginsburg, a Greenwich Village resident, summed up the concern: “People will break the law with impunity. There has to be deterrent for breaking the law.”
Mayor Adams and Governor Cuomo Push Back
The blowback hasn’t only come from conservatives. In a rare moment of intra-party conflict, Democratic Mayor Eric Adams and former Governor Andrew Cuomo have both publicly condemned Mamdani’s proposals. Adams even invoked Mamdani’s faith, saying: “Don’t know where in his Quran it states that it’s OK,” referring to decriminalizing prostitution. Cuomo warned that Mamdani’s plan could make New York City the “prostitution capital of the country.” Both framed the issue as one of public safety and moral clarity. Their criticism underscores how far Mamdani’s platform is from even mainstream Democratic policy in New York. Governor Kathy Hochul, for example, does not support defunding the police and has not endorsed Mamdani’s candidacy.
The Bragg Precedent: What a Mamdani Mayorship Could Do
Even though a mayor cannot unilaterally change state law, Mamdani could influence how laws are enforced — much like Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg did with his infamous “Day One” memo. In that directive, Bragg instructed staff to go easy on certain armed robberies and drug offenses, triggering widespread criticism and what many residents describe as a “revolving door of justice.” If Mamdani were to win, he could direct the NYPD to deprioritize arrests for misdemeanors or pressure prosecutors to avoid pursuing such cases. That possibility has led some critics to warn of an “E-ZPass for criminals” — a city where repeat offenders operate without fear of consequences. Republican mayoral candidate Curtis Sliwa put it bluntly: “This will make the police even less effective at enforcement. Ultimately, this will cause the quality of life to decline dramatically, leading to a breakdown of law and order and resulting in chaos and disorder.”
Residents Sound the Alarm
Ordinary New Yorkers are speaking out. Chelsea resident Alexander Kaplan said: “It’s just difficult to imagine how adults in their right mind could come up with it. We’re already suffering from terrible crime. This is going to make it a thousand times worse. And perception matters — just the notion of this would embolden criminals.” Maria Danzilo, a Democrat who ran for State Senate in 2022, echoed that sentiment: “Everybody is so sick and tired of this. We just want to have a normal, functional, reasonable way of getting through our day without worrying about being hurt. This is exactly the opposite of what New Yorkers need right now.”
Fact-Checkers Weigh In
The controversy has grown so loud that Snopes recently published a fact-check analyzing whether Mamdani really wants to end all misdemeanor enforcement. While the nuances of legislation versus enforcement are important, the bottom line is that Mamdani has repeatedly voiced support for deprioritizing — and even decriminalizing — entire categories of crime. He has not denied wanting to end enforcement of many misdemeanors; instead, he frames it as shifting police resources toward “serious crimes.” But critics say this is a semantic game that will result in fewer arrests, fewer prosecutions, and more danger on the streets.
The Stakes for New York City
The debate over Mamdani’s platform isn’t just about policy — it’s about the kind of city New York will become. Supporters see him as a visionary reformer who wants to address inequality and systemic injustice. Opponents see him as a dangerous ideologue whose policies will turn the nation’s largest city into a lawless experiment in failed socialism. The next mayoral election will determine whether New York doubles down on progressive criminal justice reform or pivots back toward a more traditional approach to law and order. With crime still a top concern for voters, Mamdani’s radical proposals — from decriminalizing prostitution to redefining violent crime — will likely be front and center in the months ahead.
WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.
JIMMY
Find more articles like this at steadfastandloyal.com.
h/t: Steadfast and Loyal
