The Most Unbelievable Cause of Death Ruling You’ve Ever Heard

The tragic death of Philadelphia teacher Ellen Greenberg in 2011 continues to haunt her family and raise questions about the investigation that followed. Despite the initial ruling of suicide, evidence and inconsistencies surrounding the crime scene have fueled doubts and suspicions.

The Discovery of a Gruesome Scene

Ellen Greenberg, a promising young teacher, was found dead in her apartment during a January blizzard. The discovery of her lifeless body, with a knife in her chest and covered in stab wounds and bruises, sent shockwaves through her community and left her loved ones devastated. The circumstances surrounding her death were undeniably suspicious, begging the question: Was this truly a suicide?

A Controversial Ruling

Dr. Marlon Osbourne, the Philadelphia pathologist assigned to the case, concluded that Ellen Greenberg’s death was a suicide. However, this ruling has been met with skepticism and criticism. The forensic evidence, including the presence of multiple stab wounds, some of which were inflicted from behind, raised doubts about the plausibility of suicide. Greenberg’s parents, Sandee and Dr. Josh Greenberg, refused to accept this determination and embarked on a relentless quest for justice.

A “Deeply Flawed” Investigation

In a shocking revelation, an appellate panel highlighted the “deeply flawed” nature of the investigation into Ellen Greenberg’s death. The panel uncovered evidence that a crime-scene cleanup had taken place before the arrival of the police with a search warrant. This cleanup, performed at the advice of an unidentified Philadelphia Police Department representative, raises questions about the integrity of the crime scene and the subsequent investigation.

The Battle for Justice

Faced with what they believed to be an erroneous ruling, Ellen Greenberg’s parents filed a civil lawsuit against the city, its medical examiner’s office, and Dr. Marlon Osbourne. Their objective was to compel a change in the ruling, considering the possibilities of homicide or an undetermined cause of death. The lawsuit aimed to shed light on the flaws in the investigation and the need for a more thorough examination of the evidence.

Glaring Flaws and Disturbing Facts

The appellate panel meticulously outlined the glaring flaws in the investigation, casting doubt on the original suicide ruling. The initial determination by Dr. Osbourne came after the crime scene had been cleaned, compromising the integrity of the evidence. The undisclosed involvement of police, prosecutors, and pathologists in revising Greenberg’s death certificate further fueled suspicions of a cover-up. The panel’s decision acknowledged the serious questions raised by the experts enlisted by Greenberg’s parents, highlighting the need for a reassessment of the manner of death.

Unanswered Questions and Missing Evidence

Throughout the investigation, numerous unanswered questions and missing evidence have plagued the case. Melissa Ware, the building’s property manager, revealed that she was advised by an unnamed Philadelphia Police Department representative to arrange for a third-party cleanup of the apartment. This revelation, coupled with the absence of interviews with Ware, the cleaning service, or the police representative, raises concerns about the thoroughness of the investigation.

Additionally, items crucial to the case, including Greenberg’s purse, three laptops, and two cellphones, were removed from the apartment by her fiance’s uncle. The whereabouts of these items remain unknown, further complicating the search for the truth. The failure to account for key evidence and the mishandling of the crime scene have cast a shadow of doubt over the investigation and the subsequent suicide ruling.

A Dissenting Voice and Call for Further Investigation

While the appellate panel’s majority ruled against Greenberg’s parents, Judge Patricia McCullough offered a dissenting opinion. McCullough argued that the suicide determination deprived Greenberg of her status as a victim and emphasized the need for a proper examination of the evidence. Attorney Joe Podraza, representing Greenberg’s parents, expressed astonishment at the majority opinion, labeling it a road map on how to commit murder without being held accountable. The dissenting voice and the mounting evidence supporting alternative conclusions demand a thorough and impartial investigation.

Seeking Justice: The Road Ahead

Despite the setback in their civil lawsuit, Greenberg’s parents remain determined to seek justice for their daughter. They plan to appeal the appellate panel’s decision to the state’s Supreme Court, hoping to bring attention to the flaws in the investigation and the need for accountability. The Chester County District Attorney’s Office has initiated an outside review of the case, offering a glimmer of hope for a fresh examination of the evidence. The fight for justice continues, driven by the unwavering love of a grieving family.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here