Is Ford Leaving the US? The Surprising Truth Behind Their New Strategy!

In a recent turn of events, Ford Motor Company has signaled a significant shift in its manufacturing strategy, a move that has caught the attention of the automotive industry and stakeholders alike. This strategic pivot, primarily influenced by last year’s United Auto Workers’ strike, marks a potential change in the landscape of vehicle production in the United States.

A Watershed Moment for Ford

Jim Farley, CEO of Ford, in his address at the Wolfe Research Global Auto Conference, underscored the impact of the contentious strike on the company's future plans. The strike, which was the first to hit Ford's highly profitable truck plant in Louisville, Kentucky, since the 1970s, has prompted the company to rethink where it builds its vehicles. This reflection is not just a fleeting thought but a strategic consideration as Ford transitions from internal combustion engines to electric vehicles.

The Cost of Loyalty and the Future of Manufacturing

Historically, Ford has prided itself on its strong relationship with the UAW, boasting the largest union workforce among Detroit automakers. This loyalty, however, came at a cost. Ford's decision to build its lucrative big pickup trucks in the U.S. has been more expensive compared to its competitors, who have capitalized on lower labor costs in countries like Mexico. The strike has brought this cost disparity into sharp focus, raising questions about the sustainability of Ford's current manufacturing footprint.

Despite these challenges, Ford's commitment to American labor is unwavering. The company's stance is not just about economics but also about a deeper commitment to its workforce. This balance between cost and commitment is a delicate one, as the company navigates the competitive pressures of the global auto market.

Electric Vehicles: The New Frontier

The shift towards electric vehicles is at the heart of Ford's strategic reevaluation. As the automotive industry evolves, with a growing emphasis on sustainability and innovation, Ford is positioning itself to be at the forefront of this transformation. The company is focusing on developing smaller, more affordable electric vehicles, alongside its staple of work vehicles like pickup trucks and vans.

This move is not just about keeping up with industry trends but also about responding to economic realities. The cost of electric vehicle production, coupled with the potential for federal tax credits, makes this a lucrative area for Ford. However, the question remains: where will these new electric vehicles be built? With the UAW strike highlighting the high costs of domestic manufacturing, Ford might consider more cost-effective locations, possibly outside the U.S., while still adhering to North American trade agreements.

Competing on a Global Stage

Competition in the electric vehicle market is fierce, and Ford is acutely aware of this. Chinese automakers, for instance, have rapidly gained market share in Europe, offering affordable electric vehicles that challenge established players. Ford's response to this competition will be crucial in determining its place in the global EV market.

Despite these challenges, Ford's financial health remains robust, buoyed by profits from its commercial vehicle unit and internal combustion division. This financial stability provides the company with a solid foundation to navigate the uncertainties of a rapidly changing automotive landscape.

Final Thoughts

As Ford rethinks its vehicle manufacturing strategy in the wake of the autoworkers' strike, the company stands at a crossroads. Balancing the cost of domestic manufacturing with the imperative to innovate in the electric vehicle space is no small feat. The decisions made in the coming months will not only shape Ford's future but also have broader implications for the automotive industry and American labor. The road ahead is complex, but Ford's strategic agility and commitment to innovation suggest a promising journey into this new era of vehicle manufacturing.


  1. The pressure to expand in the declining EV market is from the Obama-Biden regime, not the declining. Political financial incentives that do not strengthen the corporation but must be passed through to labor as demanded by labor management (also known for significant political contributions) are encouraging offshore of manufacturing. The Obama-Biden regime is determined to destroy the domestic industrial infrastructure while maintaining a strong corporate body for large investors and political campaign contributions. Meanwhile, domestic the blue collar workers are being put out to pasture in favor of lower cost foreign blue collar overseas. The WEF comes to mind. The conundrum for Ford is that the ICE small to mix sized pickup truck market is very profitable but the customer demographics include many faithful blue collar workers who may leave the fold when the true goals of the corporation become common knowledge.

    Over 50 years a class titled Corporate Social Responsibility was a mandatory prerequisite for a MBA program I eventually completed. one thing that I still remember from that class was the professor’s statement the “Labor leadership and corporate management are in bed together.” I believe that statement is even more valid today. And, government is charging for admission to that bedroom via regulations and promised political favors.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here