The Clash Between Mace and Cheatle
During a heated Congressional hearing, Representative Nancy Mace of South Carolina confronted Secret Service Director Kim Cheatle in a showdown that was far from pleasant for the latter. This wasn’t just an ordinary hearing, but rather a powerful demonstration of the need for accountability and transparency—or lack thereof.
Avoiding Questions Like a Professional
Mace set the tone early on, making it clear she meant business. She sought direct yes or no responses from Cheatle. But what did we witness? Evasion, deflection, and an impressive display of question-dodging. It appeared as if Cheatle had practiced how to sidestep questions.
Mace began by asking Cheatle whether she would utilize her five minutes to write her resignation letter. A bold move indeed. Cheatle, predictably, declined. However, that was merely the beginning.
The Monumental Failure
Mace grilled Cheatle about a significant failure on the part of the Secret Service. She demanded a simple yes or no answer. Was it a monumental failure? After some hesitation and attempts at elaboration, Cheatle finally conceded it was. But Mace wasn’t satisfied with just that.
Mace questioned whether this disaster was preventable. Again, after some wavering, Cheatle agreed. But the tough questions didn’t stop there.
Transparency, or Lack Thereof
Mace took on one of the biggest issues—transparency. She highlighted that the committee had to issue a subpoena to get Cheatle to testify. How transparent is that? Not very, according to Mace.
Then there was the issue of Cheatle’s opening statement being leaked to the press before the committee even saw it. Mace pointed out how it was released to Punchbowl News, Politico, and the Washington Post hours before the committee received it. Cheatle claimed ignorance about how it happened, but Mace wasn’t convinced.
Full Cooperation? Hardly
Cheatle attempted to assert that the Secret Service was fully cooperating with the committee. Mace didn’t buy it. She asked if the Secret Service had provided a comprehensive list of all law enforcement personnel present on the day of the incident. Cheatle confessed she would need to follow up on that, which Mace interpreted as a no.
Mace then asked about all audio and video recordings related to the incident. Once again, Cheatle’s response was that she’d have to follow up. Strike two.
Mace continued her relentless pursuit of truth. She questioned whether the Secret Service had provided all requested memos and communications to the committee. Cheatle’s repeated “I’ll have to get back to you” responses were starting to sound repetitive. Mace called out this evasiveness and lack of direct answers.
Training and Accountability
One of the most revealing parts of the hearing came when Mace inquired about training and accountability within the Secret Service. She sought clarity on whether the failure was due to inadequate training or poor execution. Cheatle failed to provide a clear response.
Mace pressed on, asking how many Secret Service personnel had been fired or mandated to undergo refresher training after the incident. Cheatle admitted that no one had been sacked or retrained. This is unacceptable. How can we trust an agency that doesn’t hold its people accountable?
The Failed Assassination Attempt
The hearing also delved deep into the specifics of the failed assassination attempt on Donald Trump. Mace demanded to know when law enforcement became aware of an individual on the roof with a clear line of sight to Trump. Cheatle didn’t have a definite answer.
Mace questioned the time gap between law enforcement spotting the shooter and the actual shooting. Once again, Cheatle had no precise timeline. This level of unpreparedness is shocking and disgraceful.
Mace’s Unyielding Quest for Truth
Throughout the hearing, Mace was relentless. She shed light on the Secret Service’s failures and lack of transparency. She underscored how the agency was withholding vital information needed by the committee to perform its duties. This isn’t merely about politics; it’s about accountability and safeguarding our leaders.
Mace demonstrated what true leadership entails. She wasn’t afraid to ask tough questions and demand genuine answers. Conversely, Cheatle illustrated what happens when an agency is unprepared and evasive.
Concluding Thoughts
Nancy Mace unequivocally outperformed Secret Service Director Kim Cheatle in this hearing. She exposed her evasion, dishonesty, and the agency’s failures. This hearing serves as a stark reminder of why we need strong, fearless leaders who aren’t afraid to hold others accountable. The Secret Service’s lack of transparency and accountability is a serious concern that warrants attention.
What are your thoughts on the Secret Service’s actions and Mace’s dismantling of Director Cheatle? Do you believe we need more leaders like Nancy Mace? We would love to hear your thoughts in the comments section below!
h/t: Steadfast and Loyal
This is not about the snipers. This is about attempted murder by those who refused to protect Trump.
Kind of makes me think back on the move about the French revolution, where in the scene where the arrogant elitist snobs are being driven in a seedy cart to the public platform of extermination, and an old oppressed hag steps from the crowd with a stone cold look on her wrinkled face, shouting “guillotine….guillotine”. Fair retribution, indeed.